Bowling Green Railway Co. v. Lewis' Administrator

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allegations that bullets \were reasonably fit for their intended uses without endangering human safety ... are insufficient because they offer nothing more than 'a formulaic recitation' of the elements\ of an express warranty claim
• statements that bullets were “reasonably fit for their intended uses without endangering human safety,” “perfect with powder or pellet,” “premium,” and “easy to load” were not specific affirmations or promises creating express warranties
• “The Illinois Supreme Court has explained that ‘a prayer for punitive damages is not, itself, a cause of action,’ but instead is a ‘type of remedy.’” (quoting Vincent v. Alden-Park Strathmoor, Inc., 948 N.E.2d 610, 615 (Ill. 2011))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).