Bowles v. Tatom

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a dismissed party may not be named as a nonparty
• stating that the defendant “did not object to the dismissals or otherwise assert any claim that [the other parties] should remain for purposes of allocation of fault” and that “failure to timely present such an objection waives the defense as to the dismissed parties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).