Bowles v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injuries resulting from the natural accumulation of ice, snow or frost on real estate under the control of a Commonwealth agency is not a dangerous condition of the agency’s real estate within the meaning of the real estate exception to sovereign immunity
• upholds summary judgment in favor of SEPTA where plaintiff fell on natural accumulation of ice or frost
• frost causing a fall and injury was “on” the real estate, not “of’ the real estate
• a natural accumulation of ice, snow or frost on a wooden trolley platform determined not to be a defect of the real estate
• snow causing injury is “on” the real estate, not “of’ it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).