· 7/1/1872
Bowles v. Glasgow
Citations
- 36 Tex. 94
Syllabus
<p>1. An answer verified by the oath of an attorney need not show that the material allegations were known personally to the client, provided they were stated to be within the personal knowledge of the attorney.</p> <p>2. The acceptance by an agent or attorney of Confederate money as satisfaction of a debt due to his principal or client, was no payment unless it was previously authorized or subsequently ratified by the principal or client.</p>
Judges: Ogden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.