Bowles v. City of Camden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the conspicuous absence of any documentation corroborating the defendant’s alleged dissatisfaction with the plaintiffs work performance offered support for plaintiffs claim that the proffered explanation for his discharge was pretextual
• observing that evidence of inconsistencies in an employer’s proffered explanation for an employee’s termination can cast doubt on the employer’s credibility and support an inference of pretext
• “The initial burden of making a prima facie case is relatively easy to meet.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).