Bowler v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a statutory change from jury to judge sentencing without an increase in the severity of punishment prescribed is merely a change in the procedural “mode” of sentencing and may be constitutionally applied to crimes committed prior to its enactment
• holding that a statutory change from jury to judge sentencing without an increase in the severity of punishment prescribed is merely a change in the procedural \mode\ of sentencing and may be constitutionally applied to crimes committed prior to its enactment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thayer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-11-01· cited 25×
• Hahn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-03-15· cited 12×
• State v. Barber
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-10-19· cited 9×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Todd v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-03-09· cited 55×
• Winston v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1938-09-15· cited 37×
• Carter v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1915-06-30· cited 32×
• Cofer v. Hopper
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1974-10-25· cited 31×
• Rose v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1908-07-31· cited 22×
• Leverenz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-11-19· cited 17×
• R. M. Rose Co. v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1909-10-01· cited 12×
• Overcash v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1965-04-12· cited 5×