Bowie v. Maddox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Recovery under § 1986 depends on the existence of a conspiracy under § 1985.”
• “We have no qualms about addressing an argument raised by 4 It may appear harsh at first glance not to adjust Blount’s limitations clock after his motion to recall the mandate languished in the D.C. courts. But we expect (with no need to decide here
• describing a circuit split on the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine
• detailing split of authorities but not deciding the question

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).