Bowes v. Fox-Stanley Photo Products, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implicitly held limitation of liability clause valid, but found it to be invalid in that case because the limitation was not explained or otherwise brought to the customer’s attention
• disclaimer on receipt given to customer was not binding where no evidence was introduced that “indieate[s] that the limitation of liability was explained or brought. to [the customer’s] attention”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).