Skip to main content
· 12/4/2000

Bowers v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.

Citations

  • 13 P.3d 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the mere assertion some evidence may support an inconsistent conclusion does not render a finding unsupported by substantial evidence
  • holding that the mere assertion some evidence may support an inconsistent conclusion does not render a finding unsupported by substantial evidence
  • “Repeated failure to comply with this court’s rules, notices, 14 orders, or other directives may result in a referral of counsel to the State Bar for investigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.