Skip to main content

Bowens v. State

Citations

  • 496 N.E.2d 769
  • 1986 Ind. LEXIS 1256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because the preliminary instructions outlined the elements of the offense and the jury was told to consider the preliminary instructions in deliberations, the defendant’s rights were not violated by the omission of a final instruction on the elements of robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.