Skip to main content
· 3/8/1913

Bowen v. City of La Harpe

Citations

  • 89 Kan. 1
  • 129 P. 832
  • 1913 Kan. LEXIS 1

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Negligence — Personal Injuries — Conflicting Evidence — FincE ings. The issues of fact in this case are stated, the conflicting evidence thereon referred to, and. the finding sustained.</p> <p>2. - Trial — Rejection of Competent Evidence Not Prejudicial. Where considerable testimony is admitted tending tó show that the disposition of a horse was unruly and unsafe before an occurrence in which the horse ran away, the rejection of other testimony offered to show the disposition of the horse after that occurrence is not material error although the excluded evidence related to a fact in issue and was competent.</p>

Judges: Benson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.