Bowen Tree Surgeons, Inc. v. Canal Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that questions of fact regarding the existence of dual agency existed where the agent was able to collect premiums and submit payments to insurance companies from its own account
• finding that where independent agent customarily accepted premiums and notices of claims on insurer’s behalf, questions of fact remained as to whether the agent acted as a dual agent
• finding that where independent agent customarily accepted premiums and notices of claims on insurer’s behalf, questions of fact remained as to whether the agent acted as a dual agent
• finding that questions of fact regarding the existence of dual agency existed where the agent was able to collect premiums and submit payments to insurance companies from its own account
• finding issues of fact on dual agency where agent \customarily accepted premiums and notices of premiums on [insurance company's] behalf\
• finding issues of fact on dual agency where agent “customarily accepted premiums and notices of premiums on [insurance company’s] behalf”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).