Skip to main content
· 5/28/1991

Bowdish v. Johns Creek Associates

Citations

  • 406 S.E.2d 502
  • 200 Ga. App. 93
  • 1991 Ga. App. LEXIS 747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a business’s “proven ‘track record’ of profitability’ supported the trial court’s award of lost profits
  • finding that a business’s “proven ‘track record’ of profitability” supported the trial court’s award of lost profits
  • promise made without present intent to perform is misrepresentation of material fact sufficient to support fraud claim
  • promise made without present intent to perform is misrepresentation of material fact sufficient to support fraud claim
  • damages awarded by jury were not apportioned between two claims; thus the reversal of the court’s grant of directed verdict as to one claim necessitates a new trial since there is no way to determine which, if any, damages are attributable to the reinstated claim
  • damages awarded by jury were not apportioned between two claims; thus the reversal of the court’s grant of directed verdict as to one claim necessitates a new trial since there is no way to determine which, if any, damages are attributable to the reinstated claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMurray, Sognier, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.