Bowden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find that a defendant may forfeit his right to counsel by egregious behavior.”
• “[S]ince the mid–1990s, state and federal courts have found that a defendant may forfeit his right to counsel such that the procedural safeguards typically associated with waiver of counsel do not apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• K.R., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-07-26
• Christopher James v. the State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-05-21

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• United States v. Ronald J. Goldberg
  Third Circuit· 1995-10-16· cited 259×
• United States v. Michael K. Leggett
  Third Circuit· 1998-12-03· cited 165×
• United States v. Jackie McLeod
  Eleventh Circuit· 1995-05-26· cited 126×
• Commonwealth v. Thomas
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-30· cited 123×
• Gregory Gilchrist v. John R. O'keefe, Superintendent
  Second Circuit· 2001-08-02· cited 107×
• United States v. Jack White
  Eighth Circuit· 1976-02-23· cited 65×
• State v. Hicks
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-31· cited 21×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-21· cited 6×
• Brady v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-21· cited 5×