Bowden v. Latta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “it is required that where the government intends to exculpate itself from liability for its breach of contract, it must manifest that intent in clear, direct and express language”
• stating that “it is required that where the government intends to exculpate itself from liability for its breach of contract, it must manifest that intent in clear, direct and express language”
• rejecting proffer of exception to the law-of-the case doctrine because “[t]he ‘plainly wrong’ standard, which has also been defined as a ‘clearly erroneous’ test, is a very stringent one and applies only in ‘exceptional circumstances’ ”
• decision on jurisdictional argument considered and rejected in published order of Court of Claims law of the case in same case before successor Claims Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).