Skip to main content
· 12/7/1992

Bova v. Roig

Citations

  • 604 N.E.2d 1
  • 1992 Ind. App. LEXIS 1813
  • 1992 WL 356396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recovery limited to Act's $500,000.00 statutory maximum despite plaintiff's claim that two separate acts of malpractice, one act of malpractice occurring during the surgery and one act during postoperative care, combined to cause his blindness
  • recovery limited to Act’s $500,000.00 statutory maximum despite plaintiffs claim that two separate acts of malpractice, one act of malpractice occurring during the surgery and one act during postoperative care, combined to cause his blindness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Baker, Garrard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.