Bova v. Gary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the plaintiff could not introduce corporate profits as evidence of his lost earnings while using the corporate form to limit tax and personal liability
• noting the plaintiff is the “only shareholder” and “sole shareholder”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).