Skip to main content
· 6/10/1987

Bova v. American Cyanamid Co.

Citations

  • 662 F. Supp. 483
  • 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16981

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding plaintiff’s failure to address his written request to the plan administrator personally was not a defense to his § 1132(c) claim because “the plan summary instructed] employees to direct inquiries to their personnel or employee benefits departments”
  • collecting cases; plan participant may recover benefits owed in denial of benefits claim under § 1132 but cannot recover extra-contractual compensatory and punitive damages
  • holding plaintiff's failure to address his written request to the plan administrator personally was not a defense to his § 1132(c) claim because “the plan summary instruct[ed] employees to direct inquiries to their personnel or employee benefits departments”
  • good faith failure to provide information does not excuse failure
  • aggregate award of $10,000, for approximately 3-year period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.