· 6/10/1987
Bova v. American Cyanamid Co.
Citations
- 662 F. Supp. 483
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16981
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding plaintiff’s failure to address his written request to the plan administrator personally was not a defense to his § 1132(c) claim because “the plan summary instructed] employees to direct inquiries to their personnel or employee benefits departments”
- collecting cases; plan participant may recover benefits owed in denial of benefits claim under § 1132 but cannot recover extra-contractual compensatory and punitive damages
- holding plaintiff's failure to address his written request to the plan administrator personally was not a defense to his § 1132(c) claim because “the plan summary instruct[ed] employees to direct inquiries to their personnel or employee benefits departments”
- good faith failure to provide information does not excuse failure
- aggregate award of $10,000, for approximately 3-year period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.