Bouzas v. Schroeder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there must be a factual basis in the record to support a double 7 jeopardy claim
• explaining that 6 knowledge may be inferred from the circumstances and holding that a trace amount 7 of cocaine and drug paraphernalia on the defendant’s person was sufficient to show 8 knowledge
• declining to review an issue that is permitted to be raised for the first time on appeal due to the lack of a factual basis in the record
• “This Court will not read language into a statutory provision which is clear on its face.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).