BOUTIN, JAMES, PEOPLE v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to consider arguments incorporated into opening brief by reference to summary judgment pleadings in the superior court
• applying contract law principles to find that the parties’ settlement for “policy limits” did not include Rule 82 fees
• “The mutual assent requirement cannot be defeated by the unexpressed subjective intent of one of the parties; rather it must rest on an objective manifestation of mutual intent regarding the essential terms of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).