Skip to main content
· 3/18/1999

Boustany v. Boston Dental Group, Inc.

Citations

  • 42 F. Supp. 2d 100
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4277
  • 1999 WL 151034

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the public interest almost always favors the granting” of appropriate injunctions in trademark cases and the “relevant consideration is the consumers’ interest in not being deceived or confused about the products they purchase”
  • “[W]hen a geographic term ‘is used merely to indicate the location or origin of goods and services,’ it is not protected because it is functioning in a purely descriptive manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindsay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.