Boursiquot v. Citibank F.A.B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding Connecticut state law claims seeking relief for allegedly improperly assessed \fax/statement fee\ as preempted as imposing a requirement regarding loan-related fees under 12 C.F.R. 560.2(b)(5)
• preempted state law dictating amount and whether any fax and statement fee could be charged
• a state unfair trade practices law was preempted where the plaintiff claimed the state law, not contract terms, precluded imposition or at least limited the amount of a fax and statement fee
• a state unfair trade practices law was preempted where the plaintiff claimed the state law, not contract terms, precluded imposition or at least limited the amount of a fax and statement fee
• § 560.2 preempted claims under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act because, when applied to the generally applicable statute, the claims came within the scope of § 560.2(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).