Bourke v. Conger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excluding expert in legal malpractice case because his opinion lacked foundation and depth and his report failed to identify facts supporting its conclusion
• “[A]n expert report that lacks foundation and depth will be given little consideration by courts.”
• “[A]n expert report that lacks foundation and depth will be given little consideration by courts.”
• “[A]n expert report that lacks foundation and depth will be given little consideration by courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).