Skip to main content
· 2/15/1868

Bourgeois v. Billin & Perkins

Citations

  • 20 La. 153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parent corporation had standing to enforce arbitration agreement because it 8 was an affiliate
  • holding that parent corporation had standing to enforce arbitration agreement because it 8 was an affiliate
  • “It is Uber’s alleged refusal to comply with the requirements of the ADA, not the requirements of its consumer agreements, which forms the basis of this lawsuit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.