Bourdon v. Canterbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that plaintiffs “may not bypass the [Act]’s comprehensive statutory scheme by framing [unfair-labor-practices] claims as violations of the LMRA”
• “Because a union’s breach of its duty of fair representation qualifies as an ‘unfair labor practice’ under the CSRA, claims for such a breach are within the FLRA’s exclusive jurisdiction.”
• “The plaintiffs, however, may not bypass the CSRA's comprehensive statutory scheme by framing their duty of fair representation [— i.e., unfair-labor-practices — ] claims as violations of the . . . LMRDA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).