Boulware-Allen Shoe Company's Trustee v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff could not avail himself of Rule 15(c)(1)(C) where he had brought claims against John Doe defendants because \lack of knowledge of a John Doe defendant's name does not constitute a mistake of identity\ (quoting Hogan, 738 F.3d at 517 )
• dismissing complaint against supervisory medical personnel where “[t]he allegations in the . . . Complaint that . . . [these] supervisors[] indifferently or intentionally enforced the [unwritten] policy . . . is conclusory.”
• dismissing complaint against supervisory medical personnel where “[t]he allegations in the . . . Complaint that . . . [these] supervisors[] indifferently or intentionally enforced the [unwritten] policy . . . is conclusory.”
• dismissing complaint against supervisory medical personnel where “[t]he allegations in the . . . Complaint that . . . [these] supervisors[] indifferently or intentionally enforced the [unwritten] policy . . . is conclusory.”
• summarily disposing of relation back under § 203 where Rule 15(c)(1)(C) was inapplicable
• due diligence not exercised when plaintiff had names available in medical records but asserted he was “unable to read” them and did not reach out to the court for assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).