· 3/20/1990
Boulter v. Jordan
Citations
- 733 F. Supp. 85
- 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3058
- 1990 WL 34148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving hypothe�cal ques�ons relying on “objec�ve medical tes�mony” of plain�ff's physicians but disregarding plain�ff's complaints of pain, which were found to be incredible
- approving hypothetical questions relying on “objective medical testimony” of plaintiff's physicians but disregarding plaintiff's complaints of pain, which were found to be incredible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.