Boulevard Gardens, Inc./SMZ Corp. v. City of Bayonne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court’s comment that a doctor was “a frequent witness in Fulton Courts” indicated nothing about the defendant’s guilt
• holding that the trial court’s statement that a doctor was a “frequent witness in Fulton Court” was not clear and obvious error because the comment indicated nothing about the doctor’s guilt, did not relate to a disputed issue, and had no likelihood of affecting the outcome of the trial
• aggravated assault and aggravated battery counts involving same victim did not merge because they “did not clearly charge the same conduct” and the evidence showed that there were two rounds of shots, separated by a deliberate interval, that resulted in different injuries
• trial court expression of opinion on the facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).