Boulet v. City of Las Vegas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the collateral consequences exception applies where an appellant seeks SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 ()
• explaining that this court decides appeals only when doing so affects the legal rights of the parties
• explaining that this court decides appeals only when doing so affects the legal rights of the parties
• explaining that this court decides appeals only when doing so affects the legal rights of the parties
• explaining that this court decides appeals only when doing so affects the legal rights of the parties
• since trial court did not rule that plaintiff’s claim for statutory penalties was barred by statute of limitations, court’s discussion of limitations issue was gratuitous, and issue was not properly before Supreme Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).