Skip to main content
· 4/15/2021

Boulden v. Mosley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no conflict between state law and the procedure for contesting notices of violation set forth in the ordinance
  • finding no implied preemption because chapter 316 cannot be classified as being so pervasive that it completely occupies the field
  • motion for rehearing, motion for rehearing en banc, and request for certified question denied March 6, 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.