Boudreaux v. Feibleman, Sons & Co.
Citations
- 105 La. 401
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>A merchant who authorizes his clerk to call on one of his customers for payment of his account and who, through his clerk obtains a policy of fire insurance on a building destroyed by fire a short time previous and collects the policy, is bound by the conditions by which the clerk obtained possession of the policy.</p> <p>He is without right to recognize the acts of his clerk in one part and repudiate them in another. The amount is credited as agreed upon; the remainder is returned to the customer as in accordance with the inducement held out bv the clerk.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “it is the specificity” of a statement that may require a defendant to speak more fully
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux, Provosty, Takes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.