Boudreau v. Benitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no error for purposes of child support in attributing to father’s income amounts listed as retained earnings on balance sheet for corporation solely owned by father and new wife
• no error for purposes of child support in attributing to father's income amounts listed as retained earnings on balance sheet for corporation solely owned by father and new wife
• where father and new wife owned 100 percent of corporation, trial court did not err in piercing veil of corporation and attributing to father amounts listed as retained earnings and loan from stockholder on corporate balance sheet
• where father and new wife owned 100 percent of corporation, trial court did not err in piercing veil of corporation and attributing to father amounts listed as retained earnings and loan from stockholder on corporate balance sheet

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).