Second Circuit· 4/17/1984
Boudin v. Thomas
Citations
- 732 F.2d 1107
- 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the EAJA was passed partly to encourage challenges to improper actions by the government
- law on issue in question was not clear at time of suit; government’s position was reasonable
- “[H]abeas is the appropriate action to challenge conditions of confinement where the prisoner seeks to be moved in order to remedy past constitutional violations.”
- “[H]abeas is the appropriate action to challenge conditions of confinement where the prisoner seeks to be moved in order to remedy past constitutional violations.”
- “The EAJA was passed partly to encourage challenges to improper actions by government agencies. The drafters perceived legal actions as helping to formulate public policy.” (citations omitted)
- “The EAJA was passed partly to encourage challenges to improper actions by government agencies. The drafters perceived legal actions as helping to formulate public policy.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 6,197×
- Vacchio v. AshcroftSecond Circuit· 2005-04-18· cited 52×
- Correa v. HecklerS.D. New York· 1984-05-01· cited 21×
- Jose Obando-Segura v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2021-05-28· cited 21×
- Laurence G. Russell, William L. Hanna and Eddie D. Langwell v. National Mediation BoardFifth Circuit· 1985-06-28· cited 14×
- Soto-Valentin v. HecklerE.D. New York· 1985-09-27· cited 5×
- Tavarez v. HecklerS.D. New York· 1985-06-14· cited 4×
- Hitkansut LLC v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2020-05-01· cited 4×
- Gonzalez v. BowenS.D. New York· 1986-12-23· cited 3×
- Naddi v. D.R. HillNinth Circuit· 1997-01-15· cited 1×
- Zayas v. HecklerS.D. New York· 1984-04-26· cited 1×
- United States v. DouglasEleventh Circuit· 1995-06-21
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Lincolnwood, Inc.S.D. New York· 1984-06-19
- Tirado v. BowenS.D. New York· 1988-08-08
- Adolph Michelin v. Warden Moshannon Valley Correctional CenterThird Circuit· 2026-03-02
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 11,438×
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 4,586×
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 3,383×
- Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 1,320×
- Harris v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1969-05-05· cited 955×
- Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 952×
- Ramos v. LammTenth Circuit· 1980-09-25· cited 908×
- M/G Transport Services, Inc. v. Citizens Fidelity Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court· 1981-04-06· cited 302×
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardD.C. Circuit· 1983-06-28· cited 275×
- Louis Wolfish v. Honorable Edward LeviSecond Circuit· 1978-01-24· cited 227×
- Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 214×
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsThird Circuit· 1983-05-27· cited 176×
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentFederal Circuit· 1982-11-29· cited 171×
- Ex Parte Tom TongSupreme Court· 1883-05-07· cited 168×
- Jackson v. CarlsonSeventh Circuit· 1983-05-12· cited 132×
- Rawlings v. HecklerNinth Circuit· 1984-02-13· cited 116×
- John Oguachuba v. Immigration and Naturalization Service and Dale Thomas, Warden of the Metropolitan Correctional CenterSecond Circuit· 1983-04-22· cited 112×
- Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardFourth Circuit· 1982-11-24· cited 100×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.