Skip to main content
· 8/13/2002

Boud v. SDNCO, INC.

Citations

  • 2002 UT 83
  • 54 P.3d 1131
  • 454 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 48 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 532
  • 2002 Utah LEXIS 109
  • 2002 WL 1837099

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a statement was an affirmation of fact if it was “objective in nature, i.e., verifiable or capable of being proven true or false,” as opposed to an opinion, which is subjective and open to reasonable disagreement
  • noting (1) an affirmation of fact is a statement which is objective in nature; (2) a promise must be highly specific or definite; and (3) an opinion is a statement that is neither objective nor specific enough to be a fact or promise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Durham, Howe, Russon, Wilkins, Durrant'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.