· 11/11/1933
Bouchey v. Gillilan
Citations
- 138 Kan. 404
- 26 P.2d 451
- 1933 Kan. LEXIS 213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that property acquired during parties' separation is not excluded as marital property but that \the court may properly consider manifestations of intent to lead separate lives when apportioning the marital estate\
- holding that property acquired during parties' separation is not excluded as marital property but that \the court may properly consider manifestations of intent to lead separate lives when apportioning the marital estate\
- explaining that assets acquired or income earned by one spouse during the marriage are considered to be “marital property” and are subject to apportionment
- compensation package including bonus, incentives, and “phantom stock” plan, earned after dissolution action was filed but before divorce was final, was marital property
- “Marriage is a status that legally terminates . . . upon the death of a spouse or upon entry of a judgment of divorce.”
- \Marriage is a status that legally terminates ... upon the death of a spouse or upon entry of a judgment of divorce.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Busch, Hutchison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.