Skip to main content
· 11/11/1933

Bouchey v. Gillilan

Citations

  • 138 Kan. 404
  • 26 P.2d 451
  • 1933 Kan. LEXIS 213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that property acquired during parties' separation is not excluded as marital property but that \the court may properly consider manifestations of intent to lead separate lives when apportioning the marital estate\
  • holding that property acquired during parties' separation is not excluded as marital property but that \the court may properly consider manifestations of intent to lead separate lives when apportioning the marital estate\
  • explaining that assets acquired or income earned by one spouse during the marriage are considered to be “marital property” and are subject to apportionment
  • compensation package including bonus, incentives, and “phantom stock” plan, earned after dissolution action was filed but before divorce was final, was marital property
  • “Marriage is a status that legally terminates . . . upon the death of a spouse or upon entry of a judgment of divorce.”
  • \Marriage is a status that legally terminates ... upon the death of a spouse or upon entry of a judgment of divorce.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Busch, Hutchison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.