Skip to main content
· 9/27/2006

Bouch v. State

Citations

  • 2006 WY 122
  • 143 P.3d 643
  • 2006 Wyo. LEXIS 127
  • 2006 WL 2742773

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “unique circumstances” warranted consideration of the reserved issue, and proceeding “because we have not previously addressed our concerns regarding the proper application of W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2)”
  • “Generally, a trial court should only approve a conditional plea if assured that the decision of the appellate court will dispose of the case.”
  • affidavit in support of search warrant insuffi cient to establish nexus between the suspected criminal activity and location to be searched, therefore failing to establish probable cause, and warranting suppression of resulting evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voigt, Golden, Kite, Burke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.