Skip to main content
· 12/2/2005

Bottoms v. Stapleton

Citations

  • 706 N.W.2d 411
  • 2005 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 157
  • 2005 WL 3233068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing, in a civil case, to disqualify an attorney “simply because the opposing party alleges the possibility of differing interests”
  • refusing, in a civil case, to disqualify an attorney “simply because the opposing party alleges the possibility of differing interests”
  • refusing, in a civil case, to disqualify an attorney “simply because the opposing party alleges the possibility of differing interests”
  • “[I]f there is a significant risk that representation of one client will materially limit the representation of another client, a conflict of interest actually exists . . . .”
  • “[I]f there is a significant risk that representation of one client will materially limit the representation of another client, a conflict of interest actually exists . . . .”
  • “[I]f there is a significant risk that representation of one client will materially limit the representation of another client, a conflict of interest actually exists . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.