Skip to main content
· 1/26/2024

Botto v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • bargaining order not enforced because there was no history of anti-union animus or prior violations even though employer had committed several severe violations
  • reversing bargaining order where “recurring misconduct” unlikely
  • reversing bargaining order where “recurring misconduct” unlikely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.