Skip to main content
· 7/16/1981

Bottari v. Baiata (In Re Baiata)

Citations

  • 12 B.R. 813
  • 1981 Bankr. LEXIS 3352

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Regardless of proof of injuries to property, their willful and malicious character could not be established when the plaintiff ‘failed to call any of the workman who caused the damage to testify to their intent.’
  • burden of proof for § 523 action is preponderance of evidence
  • preponderance of the evidence standard applied in a discharge case
  • Regardless of proof of injuries to property, their willful and malicious character could not be established when the plaintiff “failed to call any of the workman who caused the damage to testify as to their intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C. Albert Parente

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.