Bothke v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When... neither policy is primary or excess, we must hold that the [“excess”] clauses are mutually repugnant and the coverage must be prorated.”
• “Where, as here, the excess insurance clauses are identical in language, we do not see how we can hold the coverage of either company is primary or excess.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).