Skip to main content
· 3/10/2006

Both v. Frantz

Citations

  • 629 S.E.2d 427
  • 278 Ga. App. 556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a jury issue and reversing summary judgment on a legal malpractice claim
  • fiduciary duty claim not merely duplicative of legal malpractice in the event the jury finds no evidence of attorney-client relationship
  • fiduciary duty claim not merely duplicative of legal malpractice in the event the jury finds no evidence of attorney-client relationship
  • “[I]t is clear that the attorney-client privilege does not cover communications with respect to proposed or ongoing infractions of the law in the commission of a crime, or the perpetration of a fraud.”
  • “[I]t is clear that the attorney-client privilege does not cover communications with respect to proposed or ongoing infractions of the law in the commission of a crime, or the perpetration of a fraud.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Miller, Ellington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.