Botany Worsted Mills v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an informal agreement of settlement does not constitute a binding agreement
• holding, in the context of the WARN Act (29 U.S.C. § 2101 et seq.
• noting “[subsidiary] findings will not support a judgment unless ... the ultimate fact follows from them as a necessary inference and may be held to result as a conclusion of law”
• noting “[subsidiary] findings will not support a judgment unless . . . the ultimate fact follows from them as a necessary inference and may be held to result as a conclusion of law”
• attempted informal settlement by subordinate officials with no authorization to compromise under § 7121 was not binding on the U.S.
• attempted informal settlement by subordinate officials did not constitute binding agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).