Bosworth v. Ellison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this factor favored plaintiffs where “the business of Supermaid is providing cleaning services” and “[m]aids who work for Supermaid perform that cleaning”
• holding that a three-year non-compete agreement indicated an employer-employee relationship because it restricted the employee’s ability to use their skills in the open market
• holding that this factor favored employee status because “the primary business of Supermaid is providing cleaning services” and “[m]aids who work for Supermaid perform that cleaning”
• holding that maids who worked fixed hours at fixed rates were “employees,” reasoning that they did not have “any autonomy to increase their earning rate through managerial discretion”
• finding employee status where workers were “not allowed to vary their start and end times”
• weighing in favor of control when the em- ployer dictated the products and methods to be used at work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).