Skip to main content
· 7/1/1857

Boswell v. Laird

Citations

  • 8 Cal. 469

Syllabus

<p>Where parties employed architects, reputed to he skilled in their profession, to construct, at a designated point on a creek, a dam, or embankment, of certain specified dimensions, capable of resisting all floods and freshets of the stream for the period of two years, and to deliver it completed by a given time; and before the embankment was completed it was broken • by a sudden freshet, a:(d a large body of water, confined by it, rushed down the channel of the stream, carrying away and destroying, in its course, the store of plaintiffs, with their stock of merchandise. The employers exercised no supervision, gave no directions, furnished i|o materials, nor had they accepted the work. Plaintiffs having brought suit to recover the damage sustained by them, against the employers and contractors : Held, that the latter alone were liable.</p> <p>The relation of the parties is that of independent contractors; the relation of master and servant, or superior and subordinate, did not exist between them, and therefore the doctrine respondeat superior does not apply to the case. [</p> <p>The architects alone were responsible to third parties, the defectivo construction which caused the injury not being inherent in the original plan contracted for. If the plan of this work had been devised by the owners, and the builders simply engaged to carry it out, and the defects from which the injuries resulted had been inherent in the plan, then the former would have been liable to plaintiffs.</p> <p>A person who undertakes the erection of a building, or other work, for his own benefit, is not responsible for injuries to third persons, occasioned by the negligence of a person, or his servants, who arc actually engaged in executing the whole work, under an independent contractive</p> <p>The right of selection is the basis of the responsibility of a master or principal, for the. acts of his agent. No one can be held responsible, as principal, who has not the right to choose the agent f

Judges: Field, Terry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.