Supreme Court of Georgia· 11/12/1970
Bostwick Banking Co. v. Arnold
Citations
- 178 S.E.2d 890
- 227 Ga. 18
- 8 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 869
- 1970 Ga. LEXIS 383
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the four corners or the face of a note tell the story and the instrument itself is the best evidence of the intent of the parties
- \A court may take judicial notice that the signature of an individual on the face of a note ... is the universal method of signing a contract to assume a personal obligation.\ (citation omitted)
- “A court may take judicial notice that the signature of an individual on the face of a note . . . is the universal method of signing a contract to assume a personal obligation.” (citation omitted)
- “One who executes a note in his own name with nothing on the face of the note showing his agency cannot introduce parol evidence to show that he executed it for a principal, or that the payee knew that he intended to execute it as an agent.”
- “A court may take judicial notice that the signature of an individual on the face of a note, at the bottom on the right, without limiting or descriptive words before or after it, is the universal method of signing a contract to assume a personal obligation.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hawes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bradley v. RomeoNevada Supreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 49×
- Jackson v. Brinegar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-02-15· cited 29×
- World Insurance v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-05-20· cited 20×
- Southern Oxygen Supply Company v. De GolianSupreme Court of Georgia· 1973-04-13· cited 19×
- Kingsberry Homes v. FindleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1978-10-17· cited 14×
- Marler v. C & S BANKSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-06-09· cited 13×
- Yeomans v. Coleman, Meadows, Pate Drug Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-07-15· cited 11×
- K-Ross Building Supply Center, Inc. v. Winnipesauke Chalets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-06-26· cited 9×
- Haas v. KoskeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-04-22· cited 7×
- Hartkopf v. Heinrich Ad. BerkemannCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-06-27· cited 6×
- AARON v. UNITED HEALTH SERVICES OF GEORGIA, INC., Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-03-15· cited 6×
- Lesser v. Todd Cigarette Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1973-01-03· cited 4×
- Slocumb v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1980-12-04· cited 3×
- Barnett v. Leasing International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-10-11· cited 3×
- Rossville Bank v. Southeast Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-07-07· cited 2×
- Avery v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-01-15· cited 2×
- Myers v. MorganUtah Supreme Court· 1981-02-02· cited 2×
- Phillips v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-04-22· cited 2×
- Strickland v. Royal Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Georgia· 1973-04-13· cited 1×
- Thomas v. McNeillSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-11-22· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Coal River Collieries v. Eureka Coal & Wood Co.Supreme Court of Virginia· 1926-03-18· cited 35×
- Hansford v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia· 1896-05-04· cited 32×
- Lazarov v. KlyceTennessee Supreme Court· 1953-01-15· cited 31×
- Thomas v. EasonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1952-03-12· cited 26×
- Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-15· cited 23×
- Rawleigh Co. v. RoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1923-09-13· cited 13×
- Storrs v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri· 1831-04-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.