E.D. New York· 1/9/2018
Boston v. Suffolk Cnty.
Citations
- 326 F. Supp. 3d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, on a summary judgment motion, that ingestion of a large quantity of drugs and signs of distress such as vomiting, sleeping, slurred speech, and unsteadiness constituted a sufficiently serious danger
- concluding, on a summary judgment motion, that ingestion of a large quantity of drugs and signs of distress such as vomiting, sleeping, slurred speech, and unsteadiness constituted a sufficiently serious danger
- reading the complaint broadly to incorporate a sufficiently stated Monell claim
- Section 1024 unavailable when plaintiff asserting Section 1983 claims against John Does “had the names of [the defendant officers] before the statute of limitations had run” through, among other sources, arrest and prosecution records
- “Therefore, because the Second Circuit has explicitly held that lack of knowledge of a John Doe defendant’s name does not constitute a mistake of identity, the Plaintiff cannot avail himself of Rule 15(c)(1)(C).” (quotations and citations omitted)
- “Plaintiff cannot avail himself of the benefits of § 1024 . . . where [he] had the names of the officers before the statute of limitations expired . . . [but] made no attempt to amend his complaint or serve them.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Spatt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1989-02-28· cited 10,043×
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court· 1997-04-28· cited 7,185×
- Connick v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 2011-03-29· cited 4,276×
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court· 2015-06-22· cited 4,087×
- Hill v. CurcioneSecond Circuit· 2011-09-15· cited 2,905×
- City of Revere v. Massachusetts General HospitalSupreme Court· 1983-06-27· cited 1,572×
- Darnell v. City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2017-02-21· cited 1,487×
- Tjymas Blackmore v. Kalamazoo CountySixth Circuit· 2004-12-07· cited 1,296×
- Amnesty America v. Town of West HartfordSecond Circuit· 2004-03-15· cited 938×
- Jones v. Town of East HavenFirst Circuit· 2012-08-01· cited 887×
- Spavone v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesSecond Circuit· 2013-06-20· cited 872×
- Hogan v. FischerSecond Circuit· 2013-12-20· cited 812×
- Weyant v. OkstSecond Circuit· 1996-12-03· cited 808×
- Cash v. County of ErieSecond Circuit· 2011-08-18· cited 698×
- James Walker v. The City of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1992-09-04· cited 673×
- Cornejo v. BellSecond Circuit· 2010-01-04· cited 623×
- John J. Pitchell v. James F. Callan, Gregory Sargis and City of Hartford, David J. Lesser and Steven Del Sole, Special MastersSecond Circuit· 1994-01-03· cited 591×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.