Boston Investment Property 1 State v. E.W. Burman, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff-purchaser of property \was neither known to nor identifiable to [the] defendant contractor\ and that \[t]heir individual relationships with the original owner were wholly independent of each other * * * [so t]here was no foreseeable harm to a subsequent owner\
• finding it reasonable \for sophisticated commercial entities to utilize contract law to protect themselves from economic damages\
• answering question regarding whether a subsequent purchaser may recovery tort damages from the general contractor of a commercial office building certified by the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island
• subsequent purchaser of commercial office building not entitled to recover economic damages allegedly caused by general contractor negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).