Skip to main content
· 8/5/1992

Boston Car Company, Inc., D/B/A Acura of Boston v. Acura Automobile Division, American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 971 F.2d 811
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 486
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 17789
  • 1992 WL 185114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he practice of requesting certification after an adverse judgment has been entered should be discouraged.” (quoting Perkins v. Clarl Equip., 823 F.2d 207, 210 (8th Cir. 1987))
  • \[T]he practice of requesting certification after an adverse judgment has been entered should be discouraged.\ (quoting - 17 - Perkins v. Clark Equip. Co., 823 F.2d 207, 210 (8th Cir. 1987))
  • an untimely Rule 59 motion should not trigger \nullification\ effects of FRAP 4(a)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breyer, Lay, O'Scannlain

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.