Skip to main content

Bostic v. State

Citations

  • 359 S.E.2d 201
  • 183 Ga. App. 430
  • 1987 Ga. App. LEXIS 2719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that question of defendant’s criminal intent when he claimed that allegedly terroristic threats were just “big talk” was an issue for the jury’s consideration, not the court
  • holding that question of defendant’s criminal intent was an issue for the factfinder’s consideration, and that the defendant was not entitled to a directed verdict of acquittal based on his argument that his threats were just “big talk”
  • holding that question of defendant’s criminal intent was an issue for the factfinder’s consideration, and that the defendant was not entitled to a directed verdict of acquittal based on his argument that his threats were just “big talk”
  • noting that record disclosed that the threatened persons took the threats seriously
  • noting that record disclosed that the threatened persons took the threats seriously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, McMurray, Beasley, Divisions

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.