Bostic v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[s]uch a rule is self-evident under our system of jurisprudence. Indeed, to require a litigant ... to prove statutes enacted by Congress for the District of Columbia would be absurd.”
• “Although we normally accept as true all facts alleged in a complaint when reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss, we may take judicial notice of law, statutes, and other matters of public record.”
• “[W]e may take judicial notice of laws, statutes, and other matters of public record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).